EOWEB_COMPLAINT_ID: 47809 Submetido em: 05/09/2024 12:12:02
Nome(s) próprio(s): Fernando Apelido(s): Santamaria Lozano
País de residência: Espanha Nacionalidade: espanhol
Tel.: +34 608 33 73 13
De: fernando.santamaria.lozano@gmail.com Língua da reclamação: português
Indique se está a apresentar a reclamação em seu nome ou em nome de outra pessoa ou entidade: Eu De que instituição ou organismo da UE se queixa?
Comissão Europeia
A sua queixa diz respeito ao tratamento de um pedido de acesso a documentos por parte desta instituição ou organismo da UE?
Não.
A sua queixa diz respeito à ausência de resposta à sua correspondência por parte de uma instituição ou organismo da UE?
Não.
A sua queixa diz respeito a questões relacionadas com relações laborais numa instituição ou organismo da UE?
Não.
Qual a decisão que motiva a sua queixa? Quando é que dela tomou conhecimento? Junte anexos, se necessário.
En un texto que intento hacer llegar al ICC, el Tribunal Penal Internacional, International Criminal Court, hago las siguientes referencias a INDRA.
En un texto que trato de hacer llegar al ICC, me expreso así:
“I am also haunted by suspicions about INDRA, an Spanish, IT Corporation, that deals with the equipement of polling stations and the counting of votes in more than 140 countries. Here I find its work too silly, challenging.
An instance: seats in the Spanish Parliament, in every Parliament in the Kingdom of Spain, are allocated using a rule called the “D’Hondt System”. D’Hondt is the name of the mathematician who thought about it. It’s one of various so called “proportional systems”. The allocation of seats in a Parliament employing the D’Hondt is done this way: you divide the final number of votes obtained by each party in the election, the total amount of its votes, by increasing numbers starting in 1 until equaling the number of seats assigned to the circumscription where the Parliament whose deputies you are allocating is placed. “D’Hondt seats”, let’s call them this way, need to be calculated, then, on a final number of votes”, the total amount of the votes obtained by each of the parties. When INDRA transmits its results, the panels of INDRA always show the numbers of seats get higher and higher as the count of the votes progresses : at 40% of the votes already counted, this number of seats; at
the 65 % of the votes counted, this other one. I’d like to know how the software of INDRA calculates these seats its system assigns to the parties while the counting of the votes is still going on on.
Does the software inside the computers of INDRA predict these numbers on also predicted, INDRS does thus, at the 40 % of the votes counted, the 65 %, of the votes counted, final results? Or is the system feed with data of previous elections, ChatGPT even mentioned geographical patterns of the distribution of votes. Opacity of INDRA management is complete. Mr. Bolaños, the Minister of Justice
in Sanchez Government, says ours is an (concerning elections) “garantiste”, double-checked system. It’s a common opinion.
Do they calculate the final number of seats and then halve it?
There are lots of INDRA Websites in the Internet. online. I asked ChatGPT, an AI App designed for being generally used, what kind of evidences it would be reasonable to ask for in order to be sure that INDRA its expertise, its products, were real, not something fake. ChatGPT is related to OpenAI, Elon Musk was crucial in its creation. The headquarters of OpenAI are in San Francisco. ChatGPT said I should check the contracts of the governments with INDRA, because they should include the services offered, the cost of the services, and reliable credentials of the company. I have a post in that blog asuntosvarios.com about the last contract of the Spanish Government of Pedro Sanchez with INDRA. I won’t find reliable credentials there, at least not in the one Fernando Grande Marlaska, one of the departments under Marlaska’s rule, signed with INDRA for the services of INDRA in the 10 – N – 2019 or maybe the last Spanish General Election held in 2023, the DEBATE analyzed it and I posted about the report of the DEBATE in the blog.
Another way to check INDRA’s claims, ChatGPT told, was searching for INDRA in webs assessing corporations. A third one, to directly ask the clients of INDRA, supposedly armies all over the
world. INDRA sells advanced high-tec shields against aerial attacks to different several
governments, and software to be used in aeronautics… a number of things. INDRA headquarters are in a town called Alcobendas, in the autonomous community of Madrid. ChatGPT said INDRA’s not only designs and plans, INDRA manufactures too, and makes this in a number of facilities in the industrial areas that surround Madrid.
INDRA was born in 1993, when Felipe Gonzalez Marquez, a member of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party, was president, Gonzalez Marquez is also who signs, with King Juan Carlos I, the text of the LOREG, the Organic Law on General Electoral Regime, published in the BOE. INDRA immediately became a propriety of the Spanish Government
ChatGPT mentioned two other Spanish much voiced companies related to aeronautics in Spain in the
sixties. It added that General Franco was trying to modernize the economy of the Kingdom’s k of Spain by then, and was interested in this kind of companies. Spain had been transformed in a Kingdom by Francoist legislation as soon as 1947.”
Según ChatGPT , a INDRA algunos de los países clave donde INDRA ha estado involucrada en los procesos electorales son: España; el Reino Unido, Norueha, donde INDRA ha estado proveyendoo tecnología para sistemas de votación electrónica y el recuento seguro de votos, y Portugal y Francia a los que atmbién ha prestado estos servicios.
Tengo muchas dudas sobre INDRA. Los contratos de los gobiernos con INDRA deberían hacer constar los servicios ofertados por INDRA, su coste, y también de qué credenciales dispone el gobierno para considerar a INDRA una compañía fiable.
De no ser así, cabría que su institución investigase qué ejercitos han comprado sus escudos de defensa contra ataques aéreos? Otra vía prudente para evaluar la credibilidad de una empresa, según ChatGPT: consultar a sus clientes.
Quizás todos los elogios sobre INDRA procedan de páginas de INDRA. Quizás países sólidos de la UE estén adjudicando sus recuentos a una empresa que vemde aceite de serpiente. Sería necesario comprobarlo.
De que forma considera que a instituição ou organismo da UE agiu incorretamente?
No lo sé exactamente: no es competencia de la Comisión Europea velar por la presrvación de los valores de la Unión?
Que deve, na sua opinião, a instituição ou organismo fazer para resolver positivamente o assunto?
Efectuar una investigación sobre INDRA y, si resultara ser una empresa falsa, prohibirle de manera taxativa intervenir en ningún proceso electoral Europeo.
Já contactou a instituição ou o organismo da UE sobre o assunto que levanta?
Sim. null
Anexos:
1. CONTACTED_01_CHAT GPT about INDRA management in Spain.pages –
O objecto da sua queixa foi já alvo de decisão judicial ou encontra-se pendente em Tribunal?
Não.
Queira confirmar que tomou conhecimento das informações abaixo
Sim.
Está de acordo em que a sua queixa seja transferida para outra instituição ou organismo (europeu ou nacional) se o Provedor de Justiça Europeu entender que não pode dar-lhe seguimento?
Sim.