This is the information available today (Friday, 17/02/2023) about the processing and content of the General State Budget for 2023 on the page of the Congress of Deputies: Presupuestos Generales del Estado 2023
THEY WERE NEVER SENT TO THE SENATE.
THIS SCREENSHOT TAKEN THREE OR FOUR HOURS AFTER THE ONE ABOVE, ELSEWHERE ON THE SITE, INDICATES THAT THESE P.G.E. – 2023 ARE STILL IN PROCESS:
HOWEVER, I FIND THEM PUBLISHED IN THE BOE 12/24/2022. BOE: THE STATE OFFICIAL GAZETTE.
HERE:
LEY 31/2022 DE 23 DE DICIEMBRE, DE PRESUPUESTOS GENERALES DEL ESTADO PARA EL AÑO 2023
IT APPEARS THAT THE PROCESSING OF THE P.G.E. IS NOT ALWAYS THE SAME. I DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW QUANTITIES OF INFORMATION AS HUGE AS THESE CAN BE MANAGED IN NO EXCESSIVE TIME.
I WOULD LIKE TO REFER TO THE CONTENTS, THEIR CHILDISHNESS, WHAT THEY REVEAL AS TO WHOM IS REALLY BEING PAID, THE RUSH WITH WHICH THE COLUMNS OF FIGURES, THERE IS NO MORE, ONLY NUMBERS LACKING ANY CLARIFICATION, OMIT EVERYTHING THAT IS CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL ON A HOUSEHOLD BUDGET. IN ANOTHER ENTRY I WILL TRY TO CONCLUDE SOMETHING ABOUT HOW THEY SHOULD, COULD BE PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS OF CONGRESS.
AN EXAMPLE OF THIS ETERNAL SAND IN THE EYES, THIS NOISE THAT THEY WANT TO PASS AS “VANGUARD”:
SINCE 2015, AT LEAST, ALL P.G.E. INCLUDE IN THEIR DOCUMENTATION, AS “RELATED DOCUMENTATION,” A REPORT OF THIS TYPE, ENTITLED IN THIS WAY: “REPORT ON THE GENDER IMPACT OF THE GENERAL STATE BUDGET BILL FOR… (AND HERE THE YEAR).”
THIS TEXT, FOR THE 2015 P.G.E. IS THIS ONE: “IMPACTO DE GÉNERO DEL PROYECTO DE LEY – 2015
THE TEXT IS STUPID. THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BUDGETS, NULL.