i) 18 / 09 / 2024 : I get this answer to complaint 1585 /2024 /AGU signed by Tina Nilsson, Head of the Case-handling Unit, at the European Ombudsman.
Emily O’Reilly in the English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_O%27Reilly
ii) 18 / 11 / 2024 : I send this message to the APPF,
Fernando Santamaria Lozano ha adjuntado un documento
Fernando Santamaria Lozano (fernando.santamaria.lozano@
On 08/27/2024 I submitted to the European Ombudsman a complaint with Case Number 1585/2024/AGU. The institution concerned was the European Political Parties and Foundations Authority. In the complaint I alleged, alluding to what seemed obvious mistakes in INDRA’s handling of 10 N 2019 results:
“O certo é que, máis ca unha reclamación, busco asesoramento. Nun blog no que comenzei a escribir hai un par de anos, atopei cousas incomprensibeis sobre os resuktados electorais das eleccións do 10 – N – 2019 no Reino de España, xestionadas por INDRA SYSTEMS. O “Defensor do pobo” español, non é fiabel. Calquer reclamación de índole electoral desviaa á “Xunta Electoral Central”, e a “Xunta Electoral Central” é precisamente a responsabel dos feitos sobre os que se reclama. Teñen, pois, vostedes idea de cómo poido clarexar as miñas dúbidas? https://asuntosvarios.com/
“The truth is that, more than a complaint, I’m looking for advice. In a blog that I started writing a couple of years ago, I posted a few incomprehensible things about the results of the 10 – N – 2019 elections in Spain, managed by INDRA SYSTEMS. The Spanish Ombudsman offers not a reliable protection. Any electoral complaint is referred by him to la “Junta Electoral Central”, and la “Junta Electoral Central” is precisely responsible and compliant for the actions complained about. So, do you have any idea how I can clear up my doubts? https://asuntosvarios.com/
On 09/18/2024 Tina Nilsson, Head of the Case- handling Unit replied, I send her reply in the attached file, “If you wish to pursue the matter, I suggest that you contact the Commission and the Authority for the European Political Parties and European Political Foundations and set out the issue you raise in your complaint and the solution you are seeking”, providing me, in addition this list of European institutions for which the Office of the European Ombudsman do have competence, https://european-union.europa.
INDRA SYSTEMS manages all the electoral processes in Spain, general, regional, local and municipal elections, that is: municipal, European elections, since 2008. Recently, a department under the Ministry of Interior of the current Government of Sanchez Perez – Castejon, a Ministry run by the Judge Magistrate Fernando Grande Marlaska, has renewed the Government contract with INDRA for the management of electoral processes until 2027, for all elections to be held; this is the information that was published in advance by the newspaper EL DEBATE : https://asuntosvarios.com/
INDRA also manages electoral processes in several member states of the European Union.
In this answer dated on 09/18/2024 the Head of the Case-handling Unit specifies : As regards the Authority for the European political parties and European political foundations, its role is limited to registering, monitoring and imposing sanctions on European political parties and European political foundations.
We harbor well-founded suspicions about the reality of the company INDRA, which in Spain provides electoral assistance services, helping in recounts, transmission of data, providing electoral material to the more than 55,000 polling stations, within a framework, that of the Spanish electoral system, constituted by the Organic Law of the General Electoral Regime, the LOREG 5/1985, which we consider invalid: Spain is the only country in the European Union that orders, LOREG 5/1985 97.3, the destruction, “in the presence of all those present”, of the ballot papers, immediately after their recount in all 55.000 electoral colleges. This, according to all the experts I have been able to consult, also destroys any validation of the result. It’s the ABC of what constitutes a truly democratic election: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
Why to doubt about INDRA? INDRA seems to be the continuation of two Francoist companies, Ceselsa and CASA, with which the Franco regime took significant steps to develop the industrial and technological potential of the Kingdom of Spain (Spain was established as a kingdom by General Franco in 1947 by means of a Law of Succession to the Headship of the State, one of the Fundamental Laws of Franco regime) in fields related to defense, as aeronautics and avionics, but more responding to strategic needs than intending to play an real pioneering role. INDRA does not have, with respect to the electoral process, its own technology: (i) it does not manufacture the PDAs it claims to distribute in the Electoral Colleges Stations, INDRA has to, according to information obtained consulting OPEN AI resources, OPEN AI was co-founded by Elon Musk, recently appointed advisor to President Trump, in 2015, buy or rent these tablets to Samsumg or other companies, we are waiting to see the contracts; (ii) almost all the news about INDRA come from websites signed by INDRA; iii) even if, as noted, it were a company truly devoted to the manufacture of devices for air defense and aircraft piloting, this does not explain its competence to aggregate election results, the transmission of data from the Colleges to a Unified Data Center, etc., but, even so, iv) no patents are found in INDRA’s name for the various gadgets mentioned in its propaganda.
The legal basis 12) of those on which the European Parliament and the Council are based to adopt Regulation No 1141/2014 on the statute and financing of European Political Parties and European political foundations holds, in its end, “In particular, it is necessary for European political parties and their affiliated European political foundations to respect the values on which the Union is founded, as expressed in Article 2 TEU”. This Article 2 TEU reads: The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.
The fact that since 2008 the electoral processes in the Kingdom of Spain, already lacking guarantees under LOREG 5/1985 97.3, destruction of ballots, have been managed by INDRA in this way violates several fundamental rights: Art. 21 UDHR; Art. 1 ICCPR; Art. 20 UDHR / Art. 21 ICCPR; Art. 2 UDHR and ICCPR; Art. 12 UDHR.
Art. 10.1 of Regulation No 1141/2014 reads: “Without prejudice to the procedure laid down in paragraph 3, the Authority shall regularly verify that the conditions for registration laid down in Article 3, and the governance provisions set out in points (a), (b) and (d) to (f) of Article 4(1) and points (a) to (e) and (g) of Article 5(1), continue to be complied with by registered European political parties and European political foundations.”
Art. 10.2, on the other hand, states : “2. If the Authority finds that any of the conditions for registration or governance provisions referred to in paragraph 1, with the exception of the conditions in point (c) of Article 3(1) and point (c) of Article 3(2), are no longer complied with, it shall notify the European political party or foundation concerned.”
Art. 11.3 of REG. No 1141/2014, regarding the committee of eminent independent persons, established in 11.1, points out as its main competence: “3. When requested by the Authority, the committee shall give an opinion on any possible manifest and serious breach of the values on which the Union is founded, as referred to in point (c) of Article 3(1) and point (c) of Article 3(2), by a European political party or a European political foundation. To that end, the committee may request any relevant document and evidence from the Authority, the European Parliament, the European political party or European political foundation concerned, other political parties, political foundations or other stakeholders, and it may request to hear their representatives.”
I believe that there are grounds, according to 16 1, 2 of REG No 1141/2014, to request the termination of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party for the contract until 2027 of INDRA for the electoral management. The bad thing is that no party in the State of Spain is free, it seems, from this borderline situation.
29.1 opens up, in any case, the possibility that ‘the Authority or the Authorising Officer of the European Parliament shall give the European political party or the European political foundation concerned an opportunity to introduce the measures required to remedy the situation within a reasonable period of time, which shall not normally exceed one month.’
Perhaps this could be the solution referred to by the Office of the European Ombudsman: to urge, in the first instance, the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party to correct, or explain, the reason for the contract that EL DEBATE considers anomalous with INDRA.
DECISION_202401585_20240918_104218Esta es una copia de cortesía del correo electrónico solo para tu referencia. No es el mismo correo electrónico que han recibido tus colaboradores. Si quieres más información, haz clic aquí.
That is, as instructed by the European Ombudsman, I addressed my complaint to the APPF in a timely manner.
And also to the MEP Ana Miranda, her two emails. I have her on my WhatsApp.
iii) A note on economy:
La Constelación de los Comunes (? Por qué ahora a 22 N 2024, después de perder mi paquete de Ale-hop junto al guitarrista, y llegar a la conclusión de que a todas las empresas en el Reino de España, menos a la Hostelería, las paga el Estado) me manda por correo electrónico esto sobre el Apocalipsis y el fin de esta forma de ‘capitalismo’. Capitalismo satanico, porque todo podría hacerse BIEN también sobre ese sistema de omnimodo control estatal de la economía, con partidos de verdad, elecciones, un verdadero Estado de bienestar.
Some Constellation of the Commons (? Why now at 22 N 2024, after losing my Ale-hop package with the guitarist, and concluding that every corporation in the Kingdom of Spain, except the Hotel Industry, are paid and/or sustained by the State) e-mails me this about the Apocalypse and the end of this type of ‘capitalism’. Satanic capitalism, because everything could be done WELL also on this system of state control of the economy, but with real parties, elections, a real welfare state.
Apocalipsis – La Constelación de los Comunes
iv) Something that appeared in Google Drive; I don’t know how to read it:
In 20 days, that’s on December 10th 2024, I’ll, if still ‘street legal’, tell the European Ombudsman this: I wrote to the APPF on 18 / 09 / 2024, they didn’t answer (they won’t), I intend to insist until my birthday: 18 / 05 / 1958.
References:
On the APPF : https://www.appf.europa.eu/appf/en/home/the-authority
Regulation (EU, euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 22 on the statute and financing of European political parties and European political foundations: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R1141
TEU and TFEU : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12016ME%2FTXT
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in the English Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Functioning_of_the_European_Union#
Text of EO_WEB_COMPLAINT_ID_47674, here .
The European Commision, a Spanish Government site:
As I’m always looking for B plans, on November 20th 2024 I also wrote this to my usual correspondants:
Text in the attached file reads:
Good morning. That LOREG 5/1985 97:3 suppresses any true election is clear: the imperative to destroy the ballots, destroys also any possibility to check any result, establishes an electoral ‘anything goes’, whose chaotic consequences we are constantly experiencing.
Prostitution, on the other hand, is not covered by any law. There should probably be a specific law prohibiting it, and dictating rules to make this prohibition effective.
It has occurred to me to involve civil society in this.
Would you be up for it?
An ILG, a popular legislative initiative the last time I looked at it it involved about 500,000 signatures. I don’t know if it would be legally correct; but signatures could still be collected. Signatures could be collected by e-mail and, where possible, in the real world, street tables etc.
Who to mail to? To everyone: all municipalities, all Equality Councils, all mayors … and businesses: record labels, tattoo shops, whatever we can think of.
A template would be sent by e-mail, and they would send us the signatures in response, to one of the two things, or both. The usual data would be necessary, as minimum name with 2 surnames, and identity card.
Just now:
En colaboración con el Gobierno de Lula o con la oposición golpista de Bulsonaro?
https://www.facebook.com/share/15Fh3g83G1/?
Working with Lula’s Government or for Bulsonaro?
How are elections dealt with in Brazil?
لن أتزوج أمينة ديشيني. إنه غير متاح. لقد تم استبعاده من المشروع. هل هناك أي شخص متاح، من أي من الجنسين، حر، أو غير حر، عادي، إن لم يكن حر، لا؛