FACE TV – UGANDA
Santiago de Compostela, September 4th – 2024.
I briefly contacted Maria Kamara, an International Justice Monitor probably in Uganda https://www.ijmonitor.org/tag/maria-kamara/ . We spoke a couple of minutes in the phone. I can’t remember now the number I dialed. She was supportive and encouraged me to write one more mail. She said if she got my text she’d care about putting it in the right hands. I sent five e-mails to her address, maria.kamara@icc-cpi.int. I included her and her phone number in my folder of contacts, but when I dial her number, it worked fine for a couple of minutes yesterday, a voice says in the company files that number doesn’t belong to any client. I tried to phone Mr. Monedero, a radical Spanish writer and politician, in the Political Sciences Department at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. The voice of a man said that I was calling to the information department, and I should write a e-mail.
I’ll like Maria Kamara to present this text for me, before the International Criminal Law and also, if possible, in the right place at the UN. It’s to them to who belongs to assess the validity of my denounce, no to the guys, and the system, I denounce.
As I couldn’t reach International Justice Monitor Maria Kamala, nor the International Penal Court this morning, I asked SAMERA MUSTAFÁ, a collective caring about the needs of a number of families in Gaza, to send it for me, https://www.facebook.com/share/JHH1qyVdnuN4q5Kh/?mibextid=LQQJ4d. They won’t but I wrote this while chatting with them.
Leaving aside my personal case, the Electoral Law ruling all elections in the Kingdom of Spain rules in Art. 97.3 that the destruction of paper ballots shall be done at the Electoral Colleges, “in the presence of the public”, as soon as the results of the Electoral Colleges’ are recorded in the official “act” of each one. It might be enough. But the combination of the LOREG 5/1985 and the workings of INDRA when it managed elections, aggravates the anomalies of the process.
I can’t present any denounce anywhere in Spain.
I sent SAMERA MUSTAFÁ a link with one of the many texts of the law, LOREG 5/1985, you can find it online, and gave my address:
Fernando Santamaría Lozano
r/ San Francisco, núm. 24 – 2do
Santiago de Compostela – 15704. A Coruña.
Tlf. +34 608 33 73 13.
Told the phone number probably wouldn’t work.
You have a phone there, don’t you? I said. You shuould do it with your phone, not telepathically, nor with your mind, that never works.
This Law ruling the destruction of paper ballots in Spain, the only Law ruling vote counting and elections in the Kindom of Spain, every autonomous community, has been in force since 1985 and replicates in its main points, a 1977 Royal Decree, the first electoral regulation here, under Franco there weren’t any, which has a clear, evident Francoist style, in content and form. It makes impossible to conduct any audit of the “reported results” and puts “Provincial Boards” in charge of checking the sum of the numbers votes recorded in the “acts” of every polling station, that INDRA has already made and broadcasted the very night of the day the election was held, adding again the same numbers in the acts. Judges are chosen for reinforce with their pretended authority the process, but that sum that is made twice, a high-tech sum and a manual one made by those “Provincial Boards” composed of “magistrates” and professors with an “expertise in Law and Political Scuence”, doesn’t validate anything, no paper votes are kept, stored, in order to make a real audit of the results, maybe with a sample of the physical votes, maybe through a full manual count. It’s like many other things concerning this law, a theatrical device.
I’m afraid that there hasn’t been elections in the Kingdom of Spain since Franco’s death. I don’t know how elections were held during what’s called “La Republica”, the Republican Regime.
So, I think that’s serious.
I am also haunted by suspicions about INDRA, an Spanish, IT Corporation, that deals with the equipement of polling stations and the counting of votes in more than 140 countries. Here I find its work too silly, challenging.
An instance: seats in the Spanish Parliament, in every Parliament in the Kingdom of Spain, are allocated using a rule called the “D’Hondt System”. D’Hondt is the name of the mathematician who thought about it. It’s one of various so called “proportional systems”. The allocation of seats in a Parliament employing the D’Hondt is done this way: you divide the final number of votes obtained by each party in the election, the total amount of its votes, by increasing numbers starting in 1 until equaling the number of seats assigned to the circumscription where the Parliament whose deputies you are allocating is placed. “D’Hondt seats”, let’s call them this way, need to be calculated, then, on a final number of votes”, the total amount of the votes obtained by each of the parties. When INDRA transmits its results, the panels of INDRA always show the numbers of seats get higher and higher as the count of the votes progresses : at 40% of the votes already counted, this number of seats; at the 65 % of the votes counted, this other one. I’d like to know how the software of INDRA calculates these seats its system assigns to the parties while the counting of the votes is still going on on. Does the software inside the computers of INDRA predict these numbers on also predicted, INDRS does thus, at the 40 % of the votes counted, the 65 %, of the votes counted, final results? Or is the system feed with data of previous elections, ChatGPT even mentioned geographical patterns of the distribution of votes. Opacity of INDRA management is complete. Mr. Bolaños, the Minister of Justice in Sanchez Government, says ours is an (concerning elections) “garantiste”, double-checked system. It’s a common opinion.
Do they calculate the final number of seats and then halve it?
There are lots of INDRA Websites in the Internet. online. I asked ChatGPT, an AI App designed for being generally used, what kind of evidences it would be reasonable to ask for in order to be sure that INDRA its expertise, its products, were real, not something fake. ChatGPT is related to OpenAI, Elon Musk was crucial in its creation. The headquarters of OpenAI are in San Francisco. ChatGPT said I should check the contracts of the governments with INDRA, because they should include the services offered, the cost of the services, and reliable credentials of the company. I have a post in that blog asuntosvarios.com about the last contract of the Spanish Government of Pedro Sanchez with INDRA. I won’t find reliable credentials there, at least not in the one Fernando Grande Marlaska, one of the departments under Marlaska’s rule, signed with INDRA for the services of INDRA in the 10 – N – 2019 or maybe the last Spanish General Election held in 2023, the DEBATE analyzed it and I posted about the report of the DEBATE in the blog.
Another way to check INDRA’s claims, ChatGPT told, was searching for INDRA in webs assessing corporations. A third one, to directly ask the clients of INDRA, supposedly armies all over the world. INDRA sells advanced high-tec shields against aerial attacks to different several governments, and software to be used in aeronautics… a number of things. INDRA headquarters are in a town called Alcobendas, in the autonomous community of Madrid. ChatGPT said INDRA’s not only designs and plans, INDRA manufactures too, and makes this in a number of facilities in the industrial areas that surround Madrid.
INDRA was born in 1993, when Felipe Gonzalez Marquez, a member of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party, was president, Gonzalez Marquez is also who signs, with King Juan Carlos I, the text of the LOREG, the Organic Law on General Electoral Regime, published in the BOE. INDRA immediately became a propriety of the Spanish Government
ChatGPT mentioned two other Spanish much voiced companies related to aeronautics in Spain in the sixties. It added that General Franco was trying to modernize the economy of the Kingdom’s k of Spain by then, and was interested in this kind of companies. Spain had been transformed in a Kingdom by Francoist legislation as soon as 1947.
I analize in that blog, asuntosvarios.com, the 1-M-2009 Galician Regional Election, where Alberto Nuñez Feijoo, the leader of the Spanish People’s Party now, won in Galician his first victory, more votes than the sum of all the votes of his opponents, “mayoría absoluta” is the term for this kind of victory in Spain. I find weird political behaviors in the main political actors, data that are difficult to find, errata when the results are officially published, much voiced news about the influence of votes abroad that was never materialized, or only as a seat the count of those votes abroad would almost certainly give to one of the PSdeG, the Socialist Party of Galicia, once the counting of the votes abroad casted by voters registrated in Ourense was finished. This seat was never there, or if it was, it’s impossible to check it. When he was voted by the Parliament of Galicia as the President of La Xunta de Galicia, the Galician government, he got 38 votes in his favour, the two parties against him, PSdeG and BNG, had 25 seats and 12 seats respectively, that voted against him. A deputy from the PSdeG did not participate in the voting, but I don’t know if his absence didn’t affect the result, or Nunez Feijoo finally got two more seats. The only news I find now about this is a WIkiNews report, dated on March 2nd 2009, that refers at the results as something just known “yesterday”.
As I said, LOREG 5/1985 deletes all evidence, keeps not paper ballots, there’s no way to conduct audits.
I sent Maria Kamara, the International Justice Monitor I briefly talked to by phone, an account of my bio since 1983 in Galicia. I think that reforces the strength of my denounce.
I’d like to present all this, my bio, the maintenance of that useless electoral Law, the LOREG 5 / 1985 as a denounce at the International Criminal Court about the Spanish Regime from 1985 to 2024. I think it’s probably born of chaotic juridical foundations. A Kingdom in 1947, a showy “transition” during which a Francoist Organic Law on General hElectoral Regime was passed. When Spain entered in the European Union, Gonzalez Marquez had already passed the LOREG. ChatGPT listed a series of documents aspirants EU members had to go through, a number of evidences. Jack Delors, the President of the European Commision at the time, and Gonzalez Marquez were close friends, anyway.
Would you accept in the ICC a case like this I’m exposing: the part about me, the part about democratic elections, another part, perhaps, about Spanish laws, I don’t know much about Spanish laws, but I know a lot of Galician laws, they all are written in what I’ve called above, a style redolent of Francoism, a style with peculiar traits in content and form, that’s not rooted in reality, but is an arbitrary, empty, show of authoritarisn. My retirement began with a document of this kind, all the reports the psychiatrists have made about me in the town of Santiago de Compostela.
Three Galician “terrorists” were judged in the Audiencia Nacional a few years ago. They had no violence in their records. They were activists more than terrorists. According to the press their trial at the Audiencia Nacional lasted five minutes. Sanchez passed an Amnesty Law for the independentists in Catalunya; these other prisioners didn’t benefit of any Amnesty Law.
Would you accept this case? Which case? The case about me? A case about the whole Kingdom of Spain and the lies that the propaganda of the Regime diffunded; a case just about the autonomous community of Galicia, me and Mr. Núñez Feijoo and the things that happened in Santiago de Compostela since I dared to discus the way the results were managed in the March 1st 2009 Election to the Parliament of Galicia, the first victory, “mayoría absoluta”, of Alberto Nuñez Feijoo?
I can support everything I’m writing about, my expedients, my psychiatrical records, the laws I refer to with original, not always original, a few things were lost in the way, but at least credible copies with the seal of having been once compared to the originals.
My e-mail won’t probably work. I have terrible experiences about that.
I don’t know how the ICC could be able to communicate with me in Santiago de Compostela. Asking someone to visit me perhaps. Or adressing the answer to FACE TV or anyone that on a non hacked computer, a non hacked phone, whatever, can send this to an ICC reliable address.
SAMERA MUSTAFÁ ASKED ME, MANY PEOPLE I SUPPOSE TO DIFFUND THE LINKS WHERE THEY ASK FOR FUNDS :
AND IN PAYPAL: http://paypal.me/amany54
Non Gubernamental Organizations working in Gaza strongly warn against sending any money to accounts like these, not related to ONGs. Samera Mustafá says there are great problems in order to receive any money from them.
On the March 1st, 2009 election to the Parliament of Galicia, the first victory, the foundation of Mr. Núñez Feijoo career as a an autonomic president and a political leader, I posted this in my blog: https://asuntosvarios.com/2022/08/27/la-primera-mayoria-absoluta-de-alberto-nunez-feijoo-en-galicia-y-mi-ingreso-psiquiatrico-involuntario-si-ya-son-muchos-tres-dias-despues-historia-de-una-sincronia/
The succession of Prime Ministers in Spain is meaningful: Felipe Gonzalez, the medicine man who passed the LOREG, and hired ENTE, based in the Chile ruled by Pinochet, to do count of the votes: Jose Maria Aznar who, that’s what is said , cut significantly the deficit of Spain, his Minister of Economy at the time , Rodrigo Rato is still subjected to prison sentences, I’ve never tried to understand; Zapatero promoted LGBTI rights and is responsible of the new Statute of Autonomy of Catalunya, that probably triggered, was one of the triggers of the “Proces”. Mariano Rajoy was somewhat apathic. I’ve had a look at his Financial Laws for Spain: they all include at the end, somewhere, a note about the impact they make on gender issues. Really? Sanchez presents himself as ready to introduce a change, any change. No one of them noticed the cancer the LOREG 5/1985/ supposed for a real democracy in Spain. Bob Dylan mentions it: “There’s no time to think”.
Too innocent? Too busy? Too dependent of that law?
On the other hand, the long, fearless participation of Judges in this electoral Spanish jest, counting for a second time, with the add of faculties expert in Law and Political Sciences, the “acts” in the electoral colleges the high – tech computers of INDRA had already counted the night of the day the election was held, that performance sustained for almost fifty years, would be enough to look for another name, another people to hold the “Judicial Power”, that like the destruction of paper ballots, looks deeply rooted in the Francoist Regime.
Guys that have acted like this cannot be trusted, their sentences, their judicial activity must be revised and, if necessary, decisions must be taken to expell them from their posts.
Only by that the Spanish State will transform itself from a satanic dictatorship to a parliamentary monarchy.
This was the first page I created when I started this blog:
https://asuntosvarios.com/listado-de-los-juzgados-de-santiago-de-compostela/