[EOWEB_COMPLAINT_ID]: 47696 Submetido em: 28/08/2024 00:36:53
Nome(s) próprio(s): Fernando Apelido(s): Santamaria Lozano
País de residência: Espanha Nacionalidade: espanhol
Tel.: +34 608 33 73 13
De: fernando.santamaria.lozano@gmail.com Língua da reclamação: português
Indique se está a apresentar a reclamação em seu nome ou em nome de outra pessoa ou entidade: Eu De que instituição ou organismo da UE se queixa?
Comissão Europeia
A sua queixa diz respeito ao tratamento de um pedido de acesso a documentos por parte desta instituição ou organismo da UE?
Não.
A sua queixa diz respeito à ausência de resposta à sua correspondência por parte de uma instituição ou organismo da UE?
Não.
A sua queixa diz respeito a questões relacionadas com relações laborais numa instituição ou organismo da UE?
Sim.
Utilizou todas as possibilidades de requerimentos e queixas internos previstas no Estatuto dos Funcionários da UE ou em qualquer outro procedimento equivalente aplicável?
Sim.
O prazo de resposta da instituição ou organismo da UE já expirou?
Sim.
Qual a decisão que motiva a sua queixa? Quando é que dela tomou conhecimento? Junte anexos, se necessário.
Fui consciente hace poco. Una situación de hostigamiento mortal en la ciudad De Santiago de
Compostela, me ha hecho pensar una y otra vez en que podía estar ocurriendo en el Reino de España, y
he llegado a las conclusiones que me empujan a presentar esta segunda queja.
De que forma considera que a instituição ou organismo da UE agiu incorretamente?
La Comisión Europea ha venido interviniendo en la política del Reino de España, a instancias del líder del Partido Popular, Alberto Núñez Feijoo, sopesando las condiciones de la amnistía otorgada por Sánchez a los políticos catalanes, visitando España, entrevistándose con sus instituciones, haciendo caso omiso de que el Estado Español, establecido en 1947 como reino por el Dictador Francisco Franco, no es un estado democrático, porque carece del principio mismo de este: no hay ningún tipo de control sobre los resultados electorales, su sistema de “juntas” compuestas por jueces para realizar un escrutinio final consistente solo en la suma de las cifras consignadas en las actas de las mesas electorales, tras la destrucción por ley, la Ley Orgánica de Régimen Electoral General, de todo vestigio de los votos en papel, impidiendo por tanto cualquier verificación de los resultados, la idea la he aprendido del profesor Philip B. Stark de la universidad de Berkeley, un experto en auditorías de votaciones realizadas con el sistema D’Hondt, con el que cruce varios correos, se limita a reproducir, en una ley, la LOREG, de 1985, ya en tiempos del socialista Felipe González, un decreto preconstitucional de 1977, que ya establecía, con anterioridad a la Constitución de 1978, y supongo sus valores, “juntas” de jueces que contasen actas y “destrucción de los votos físicos”. Es notorio. Según las aplicaciones de Inteligencia Artuficial, asequibles a cualquier usuario, el único país en el que ocurre algo semejante, en menor grado, hay un tiempo para conservar los votos físicos, es Hungría; La empresa de alta tecnología, ENTEL, no estoy seguro, que precedió a INDRA SYSTEMS en el recuento de esas actas, primero cuenta las actas una empresa de alta tecnología contratada por el Gobierno, después, “juntas” de jueces realizan ese mismo recuento, esa empresa, ENTEL, que efectuó la “agregación” de las actas, recurro otra vez a la terminología de Stark, que distingue con claridad entre “reported results” y resultados, me parece, podría quizás comprobarse, que operaba, tuvo su origen en Chile en 1987, en tiempo del dictador Pinochet. En cuanto a INDRA, analizando, simplemente observando, los resultados
electorales transmitidos con ocasión de las elecciones generales del 10 – N – 2019, he encontrado datos transmitidos tan insultantes, que solo puedo juzgarlos un acto de cinismo. Los recojo en la entrada LXXX de mi blog, bajo el rótulo “muestras”, las muestras ii), iii) iv). Es esta: https://asuntosvarios.com/2023/02/28/los-videos-de-la-vanguardia-y-el-mundo-algunas-muestras-de-lo-que-indra-systema
Realmente la Comisión es tan estupida, carece hasta tal punto de conocimiento de los países en los que interviene, y a instancias de quien, que ignora todo o esto, o hay que pensar que se trata de un estado de cosas al que está acostumbrada. Sea como fuere, su insistencia en fiscalizar unos aspectos de la política del Reino español, a instancias de un ínclito heredero, está en su currículum,del ex-ministro franquista, Manuel Fraga Iribarne, Núñez Feijoo fue su vice-presidente en una Galicia que ha quedado destruida, Fraga Iribarne fue el fundador del Partido Popular, alguna relación con el “Partido Popular Europeo?, y cerrar los ojos a cualquier otra cosa que ocurra en el Reino, me parece un insulto a las esperanzas europeístas del sufrido, demasiado sufrido, pueblo español. Buena parte de lo mismo es aplicable al Parlamento Europeo, que acoge un país, blanquea un país, en esas condiciones.
Que deve, na sua opinião, a instituição ou organismo fazer para resolver positivamente o assunto?
En mi opinión, la Comisión Europea, debería considerar esta situación a la que me refiero, de
oficio, porque supone una lacra para Europa, y, si quiere poner freno al independentismo catalán, advertir a sus representantes de que antes que cualquier otra cosa, lo previo, es conseguir que se den el el Estado español garantías a los procesos electorales, y no emplear estos mismos procesos, para fines que solo consiguen enturbiar una situación que ya es extremadamente complicada.
Aquí en Galicia, donde el Sr. Feijoo ha ejercido un poder omnimodo durante más de una década, ante el silencio de todos los partidos, no tiene que ver con mi queja, pero puede de algún modo reforzarla, tengo ejemplos fehacientes, de la complicidad de los psiquiatras de la sanidad pública gallega, tres psiquiatras al menos, con el poder arbitrario, de institutos mal gestionados, en defensa de actos de mala praxis, consciente, alevosa, de las delegaciones y la Conselleria de Educación desde el año 2000, bueno, desde 1983, en que la Inspección de Bachillerato, por pura simpatía, cuando fui a hacer una reclamación, me otorgó un título falso, en tiempos de Rodríguez Alborg, hasta el hoy mismo, en que bandas de adolescentes acosan diariamente, a todas horas mi casa.
Já contactou a instituição ou o organismo da UE sobre o assunto que levanta?
Sim. El primer archivo es el cuarto de una serie de correos que hice llegar a la Comisión de
Venecia, a propósito de todas estas que mencionó del sistema electoral español. Llegue a entablar contacto telefónico con sus oficinas, pero, a la postre, me pareció entender que la Comisión, muy descortés en las últimas llamadas, solo actuaba a instancias de representantes “autorizados”, no simples ciudadanos. Poco después el señor Feijoo, representante “autorizado”, al parecer, comenzó a acudir a la Comisión de Venecia.
El segundo archivo es mi sentencia de incapacitación judicial aquí en Galicia. No entro en detalles. Los informes psiquiátricos, aportados en calidad de “informes periciales” por un psiquiatra de la sanidad pública gallega incurren en falsedad. Puedo aportar documentación que lo demuestre.
El tercer archivo, creo, es la respuesta del Consejo General del Poder Judicial a mi queja sobre ese proceso, dándome vía libre a la recuperación de mis derechos.
Anexos:
1. CONTACTED_01_image.jpg – El cuarto mail que he enviado, con fecha del 14 de febrero de 2023, respecto a los procedimientos electorales en el Pais
2. CONTACTED_02_Sentencia 243.pages –
3. CONTACTED_03_IMG_3908.png –
O objecto da sua queixa foi já alvo de decisão judicial ou encontra-se pendente em Tribunal?
Não.
Queira confirmar que tomou conhecimento das informações abaixo
Sim.
Está de acordo em que a sua queixa seja transferida para outra instituição ou organismo (europeu ou nacional) se o Provedor de Justiça Europeu entender que não pode dar-lhe seguimento?
Sim.
OBSERVACIONES AÑADIDAS:
i) Two days ago I filed a a denounce, to the European Public Prosecutor Office, concerning a possible mismanagement of European Funds in Galicia, the cradle and main supporter since Manuel Fraga Iribarne of the Spanish People’s Party, where Mr. Nuñez Feijoo holded the presidency of the Galician Xunta, Galician Government, from 2009 to 2022, 12 years, when he was elected leader of the Spanish, the national, People’s Party, leaving as his heir Alfonso Rueda Valenzuela, a strong man of the People’s Party and his vice-president. Rueda Valenzuela won regional elections in Galicia last February, so he will be in office for at least three years and a half. I argued in my denounce to the EPPO that the European Funds mentioned in the introduction of that Galician Finance Law for 2024, passed by Galician Parliament on December 2023, don’t know how, you should ask them, might have been misused, or even never existed. Rueda often approves his Budgets as a token of efficiency, before the Spanish government passes theirs, and Sanchez’s government, well, doesn’t talk at all about the money assigned to the regions. The Galician Fiancial law for 2024 I tried submitted the EPPO asking for an expert opinion, was in my opinion caotic, didn’t provide a clear account of how these funds were inverted, asked the OpenAI requisites for Finacial Laws, the answer was somewaht excessive, talked about taxes, the taxes the regions collect in their territory according the Spanish Constitution, a control on banks, don’t know who is in control banks here, is it a national competence, or is it regional? The guy in charge of the Conselleria de Fazenda, Finance Regional Ministery, is an expert from A Coruña, Mr. Corgo. Have serious trouble with my devices, they should be charging, but they don’t, they’re dead, so I can look now for his full name. My mails are disappearing too. As I was diagnosed several times with a psychotic crisis, well, I think I may be in one. I got this morning the answer from the EPPO, they told me their European office had no competence on my request, because the Delegated European Prosecutor in Spain, hadn’t allowed them to follow, monitorize, etc their investigation, and without this enablement of the Delegate European Prosecutor towards the main European office, the task was beyond their scope, they quoted a Council Regulation about enhanced cooperation … I can’t quote their rule, I’m writing this on my computer and my Iphone and my Ipad are dead, I told you, I can’t do two things at a time. They said they had carefully examined my report, don’t know how, because it’s a three hundred and fifty pages document. Added a couple of paragraphs I don’t quite understand. Asked OpenAI about this, the App told me the Delegate European Prosecutor in Spain is a part of the judicial system, managed by judges, judges here.. Maybe we should talk about judges some day. They are are in charge, I am sure they are fucking tired of these succubus, of the final count of all the records kept at the polling stations with the number of votes writen in them. After this records are completed, INDRA aggregates these results and broadcasts their high-tech aggreghation on a showy low resolution display. Those are the “provisional results”. Three days later, judges, guys with a career, a knowledge of logic, count again those lousy records. Their count alway matches INDRA provisonal reported results. Paper ballots are destroyed by law, the Electoral Law of 1985, LOREG, passed by the Parliament of Felipe Gonzalez Marquez, copying, I already told you that, a Royal Decree passed in 1977 under Suarez, who appointed without any election by king Juan Carlos in 1976, framed with it for the first time our first democratic elections, under Dictator Franco there weren’t any, an election in which he got elected again. Returning to our issue, I can’t understand how a national European Delegated Prosecutor Office can refuse to check the Financial Law of a regional government. Is this another proof of Mr. Feijoo, or the National People’s Party satanic power here, in the Spanish Kingdom? Is there a fear that everything is wrong, every Financial Law, in how many regions, is a cover, a pretentious document made to deceive the crowd, but lacking sense? Just for fun? Or is it pure evil? The Galician Financial Law, passed by the Parliament of Galicia, with Rueda Valenzuela president of the Xunta de Galicia, and Mr. Santalices, as President of the Parliament, I submitted to the EPPO asking for their opinion shoud be this one: https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/2023/20231229/AnuncioC3B0-281223-0006_es.html I don’t know if the link opens in the document I want to show as evidence. Sure it doesn’t. Things change quickly in the Spanish Kingdom. Fucking is forbidden, something they mock. I’m afraid the link is wrong. You can check the page of the Galician Parliament, sure you find a showy transparency Galician web. Check everything. The doc I link , the last time I opened it was in Spanish. Concerning EPPO’s mail, I think the register number is also different, last time I saw it, it had the time my report had been sent/received, how do they do this? Is this the way they are fucking the European Union? The only way, in my opinion, is to enforce the rule of law, not theirs, authentic, transparent laws everywhere.
ii) President (Galician Govenment) Alberto Nuñez Feijoo, chosen by Francoist ex-minister Manuel Fraga Iribarne as vicepresident of Galician Government in 2003, at 43, can’t say. This is my blog entry (my blog: asuntosvarios.com) about him: https://asuntosvarios.com/2022/08/21/el-efecto-feyjoo/). On the other hand, searching the internet today (29 – 8 – 2024) I found there’s some distinction between the Eurpean People’s Party, to which Ursula Von der Leyen, the President of the European Commision, belongs, and the EPP (group), the transnational group to which the Spanish People’s Party of Nuñez Feijoo and other conservative parties are assigned in the European Parliament; this is the link in the English Wikipedia about the European People’s Party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_People’s_Party?wprov=sfti1; this one the link on the European People’s Party (group): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_People’s_Party?wprov=sfti1. If links don’t work just lok for both at the English Wikipedia. I don’t know, can’t say nothing about this, without losing lots of time, trying to understand it througly. In any case, Ursula Von der Leyen, the President of the European Commision, visited Galicia in June 2024, met with Nuñez Feijoo in Santiago de Compostela, even spoke at a meeting with Feijoo before 4000 people in a “romeria” in a place called “O Pino” in A Coruña. I mean in my complaint that the European Commision seems to know little about Spanish politics, and should engage, don’t know how, by means of the European Council, the Venice Commision, which Feijoo has also been trying to manipulate (BTW, it seems the Venice Commision can’t act by the request of particular citizens, nor even particular parties, it’s needed some sort of national consensus). It has intervened in Spanish politics at the request of ANF, Europe has already been here, probably misleaded and should care about the establishment of democratic ways of behaviour in the Spanish Kingdom. Promoting auditable elections could be a starting point. Finally I’d like to explain another way in which European Institutions, and even the Spanish Government, seem to be confused by ANF crazy hunger for power. Brusels has mediated between the Spanish Government and Nuñez Feijoo about the impossible renovation of the CGPJ (General Council of the Judicial Power). I posted an analysis about this in asuntosvarios.com: https://asuntosvarios.com/2022/08/30/sueno-no-115-acerca-de-los-nombramientos-del-cppj-y-el-tc/ I include as an attached file my chat (“chat”: “electronic conversation”) with chatGPT, the App created by Elon Musk, co-founder of OpenAI. There’s a lot of slander about me using it here. “Chat” seems a dirty word. It just means that “electronic conversation”. This OpenAI assistant is basically in agreement with me and many people here. The renewal of the CGPJ is just throwing dust in your eyes. Laws concerning it are clear, the one in force now, the Organic Law 4/2013, reforming Organic Law 6/1985 of July 1st, on the Judicial Power, was passed by Mariano Rajoy Brey, also of the Spanish People’s Party, when he was president, and CGPJ members should be elected not in the private offices of Sanchez and Nuñez Feijoo, but in the Parliament, just there. My enquiry about this with that OpenAI chat is included in the file below. Could you the European Ombudsman explain the Eurpean Commision these issues and provide some reasonable way of arranging things in Spain? I do think there should be a careful following up of political activities in the Spanish State. This is something I’m saying since 2006, when I legalized an Indepedentist Galician Party, the UDNG, Uniom for a Democracy in the Galician Nation, or a “National Democracy in Galicia”. Can’t attach the info about this now. It’s almost five am, Iphone and Ipad are dead. You can find something on the UDNG online yet. We said that the parties system was badly implemented in the Spanish State, that a State is contained in its laws, and laws were difficult to understand here.